The so-called “bailout bill”
Dear elected representatives,
I write you as a voting constituent outraged by the possibility of Congress passing the so-called “bailout bill” put forward by Messrs. Bush, Bernanke, and Paulson. I implore you, as my representative, to weigh carefully the options before you.
A vote to pass this bill is a vote of confidence in the George W. Bush administration and future administrations, whomever they may be.
It is a vote that abdicates Congress’s constitutional duty to oversee the acts of the executive branch and provide checks against imbalances and abuses of power.
One cannot honestly decry the actions of the Bush administration, as Democrats have for nearly eight years, and then hand them the keys to the economy – not to mention $700B of hard-earned taxpayer money – merely because it is politically expedient. There are greater ills than inaction.
Passages such as the following are reason enough to reject this plan outright.
Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency.
This is a constitutional travesty.
The plan itself is a shot in the dark; Messrs. Paulson and Bernanke themselves testified that it may or may not work, and that the $700B amount is just an estimate. They may in fact need to appropriate yet more taxpayer money to bail out corrupt and incompetent investors. With language like the above, Congress may be powerless to stop them, and by their own hand no less. Most worrying is that when Congress lacks the power, so does the citizenry.
If Congress passes this bill and grants the executive branch the powers described within, the American people will have no legal recourse to stop the Department of the Treasury and the Federal Reserve from squandering their wealth.
I urge you, sirs and madams, to vote against any plan that would strip Congress of its oversight responsibility. For this is your constitutional duty and is a key mechanism by which our republic functions. When this duty is removed from the legislative branch, members of whom are elected directly by the people and serve at our pleasure, the government ceases to function as it was intended.
I cannot in good conscience support any member of Congress who would break his oath to support and defend the Constitution, and I, like most Americans, do vote my conscience.
P.S. Sorry for all the bold.